Escapism & Distraction As a Social Control During the Roman Empire

Escapism and distraction are social controls that cansets of gladiatorial spectacle positioned almost 50
be employed by a governing body to hideyears apart, just happened to fall on times of conflict.
inadequacies or divert attention from themes thatA more likely explanation is that these gladiatorial
can cause malcontent among the populace. It isspectacles were put on to distract the people from
important to distinguish between the two; distractionthe turmoil of war. Another explanation is that there
refers to anything that can take the attention of thewere gladiatorial spectacles that fell within this 50
populace away from the inadequacies of theyear gap, but they were not particularly noteworthy,
government where as escapism refers to specificallyand greater publicity was generated for these two
removing the minds of the individuals from therecorded games again for the purpose of distraction
situation that they are in, in order to escape anythingof the masses.
that brings discontent to their lives.Escapism
DistractionEscapism could well be the biggest factor in social
Distraction was a tool that could be used bycontrol that gladiatorial spectacles had over its
Emperors both to divert attention from currentaudience. In contemporary society there are a
objectionable events. Impending risk of warfarenumber of escapisms that are available even to
increased anxiety within Roman society, thethose who do not have a large disposable income.
development of gladiatorial spectacle could bothSome of the most popular escapisms in modern
demonstrate the continuing competence of thesociety such as television, the internet, film, and
governing body of Rome, even during a crisis (Futrellcomputer games were not accessible to the Romans.
2006). Not only could the gladiatorial spectacle distractGranted they had food, literature and recreational
the citizens from contemporary issues but it couldgames, but none of these can draw comparison with
also "erase public memories of political blunders" in thethe hold that television and the internet has on
past (Shelton 1998, p333).society today. This is where the gladiatorial
Distraction from warfare was an obvious connection,spectacles came into play; they provided the
however distraction could also be used to keep "theaudience with a complete distraction from their
populace amused and out of mischief" (Lewis andmundane day to day lives. The comradery of sitting
Reinhold, 1990, p142). Auguet (1994, p185) furtheramongst their peers, the historical stories that some
added weight to this view by describing gladiatorialof the spectacles told, and the opportunity to wrap
spectacle as "a first rate means of keeping peopleoneself up in the glory of Rome, provided the ideal
amused". Grant (1967, p104) also agreed with thisescape from issues of war, disease, political unrest
concept exclaiming that Emperors expressed thethat may have otherwise had a more detrimental
wish that the "potentially unruly and dangerous cityaffect on the psychology of the population.
population" be "amused", also adding the idea that thisKyle (2007, p301) stated that attendees of
would and keep them "quiet".gladiatorial spectacles, utilised them to "escape their
As stated earlier (see Literature Review) the firstdeplorable living conditions". Shelton (1998, p334)
reported date of the gladiatorial spectacle was in 264further elaborates declaring that political figures hoped
BCE and at the time of the First Punic War. Thethat these diversions would "take people's minds off
second recorded date of the gladiatorial spectacleproblems like unemployment and food shortages".
was not until 216 BCE again coinciding with a year ofAccording to Shelton (1998, p349) viewing the
war in which the battle of Cannae took placegladiatorial spectacles would allow "people who
(Shadrake 2005). This leaves a gap of almost 50themselves felt powerless and brutalised" to find
years in which there is no record of any gladiatorial"some satisfaction in watching the infliction of pain on
spectacle having taken place in the Roman Empire. Itothers".
seems too much of a coincidence that these two